• Home
  • Journal Info
    • Aims and Scope
    • Indexing Info
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice
    • Policies
  • Editoral Board
  • Current Issues
  • Archives
  • Submission Checklist
  • Submission
  • Contact

Volume 1 - SUPPLEMENT of ABSTRACTS

Preliminary Results of Genetic Barcoding Serranidae Species from Turkish Coastline

  • Mehmet Baki Yokes AMBRD-Labs, Hanımefendi Sk., no:160/6, Şişli İstanbul
    bakiyokes@gmail.com
  • Deniz Kanca Haliç Üniversitesi Moleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik Bölümü, Sütlüce, İstanbul
    denizkanca@halic.edu.tr
  • Serdar Erdogan 3GTS Laboratuvarlar Grubu, Evren Mah., Emrak Sk., no: 2, Güneşli, İstanbul
    serdarerdogan@gtslab.com
Keywords: COI, Barcoding, Serranidae, Turkey

Abstract

In the framework of a barcoding project 275 Serranid specimens have been collected from Turkish coastline between 2007-2016. Until now 66 of the specimens (Epinephelus aeneus (n=10), Epinephelus caninus (n=2), Epinephelus costae (n=5), Epinephelus marginatus (n=10), Hyporthodus haifensis (n=6), Mycteroperca rubra (n=3), Serranus cabrilla (n=10), Serranus hepatus (n=10), Serranus scriba (n=10)) were investigated for mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. Total DNA was isolated from either muscle or fin tissue. COI gene was partially amplified with universal primers and sequenced. High genetic differences were observed between the species. Each species had a unique barcode, enabling the species be easily identified from the COI barcode. Intra-species variation was only found in Serranus hepatus. The results (642 bp) were compared with the GeneBank entries. It was observed that the sequences were highly matched (99-100 %) the data from other Mediterranean countries. Surprisingly, our data showed less similarity with the sequences previously reported from Turkey. Although allelic variations have been reported for Epinephelus aeneus (4 alleles), Epinephelus marginatus (5 alleles), Serranus cabrilla (3 alleles) and Serranus scriba (3 alleles) from Turkey, we did not yet found any COI sequence variations in these species. Moreover, the previous reports of Serranus scriba sequences from Turkey by Keskin et al. (2013) did not closely matched our sequence (625/642 and 624/642 bp match), whereas our sequence is 100% in accordance with the entries from Italy, France and Turkey (Iskenderun Bay), suggesting that previous records of Keskin et al. (2013) might belong to a different species.

PlumX

  • PDF

Date

August 2016

Page Number

15